Cases 1 - 10 of 2,309
Taylor-McCalister v. Wal-Mart Stores East Limited Partnership
as 5:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mikcorah Taylor-McCalister
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv11540
Plaintiff:
Larhonda Brooks
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Greene v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (JRG2)
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Joy Greene
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Morse v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv10873
Plaintiff:
Gary Morse
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Arp v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
James Arp, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP d/b/a Wal-Mart #698 and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Wal-Mart#698
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dillard v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 1:2024cv00181
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Scheetz v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv11430
Plaintiff:
Pamela Scheetz
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Roehling et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Lora Roehling and Michael Roehling
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
