Cases 1 - 10 of 16,227
Ross v. U.S. et al
as 3:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Day Springs Family Care, Steve Lowe, UT Medical Neurosurgeons Knoxville, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstead v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02671
Respondent:
Warden Harrison
Petitioner:
Richard Armstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dukes v. Forshey
as 2:2024cv03957
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Petitioner:
Eddie Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gongora-Baltan v. Healy
as 4:2024cv01597
Respondent:
Warden Ian Healy
Petitioner:
Edwin Daniel Gongora-Baltan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
as 3:2024cv00254
Petitioner:
Bernard M. Jackson
Respondent:
Warden, Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Apel v. Henderson et al.
as 3:2024cv01248
Defendant:
Warden Kim Henderson, Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Traci Apel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chambers v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01114
Respondent:
Warden Robert Adams
Petitioner:
LaNorris O'Brien Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Brian Jermaine Washington
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Fender
as 5:2024cv01564
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Petitioner:
Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hundley v. Cool
as 4:2024cv01565
Petitioner:
Lance Hundley
Respondent:
Warden William Cool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
