Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Butler v. Enjoy Am, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02351
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Butler
Defendant:
Enjoy Am, LLC, Andrew C. Ticer and Michael Hudman
Ames v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Bonnie M. Ames
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norman v. Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10657
Plaintiff:
Dalana Norman
Defendant:
Woodward Detroit CVS, LLC, CAL-AM Properties, Inc. d/b/a East Ten Shopping Center and CAL-AM Properties, Inc Doing business as East Ten Shopping Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lucasville Masonic Lodge No. 465 F&AM v. Hastings Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Lucasville Masonic Lodge No. 465 F&AM
Defendant:
Hastings Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
REQUEST TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIALS TO GENERAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FRANKFURT AM MAIN
as 3:2023sm00008
In Re:
REQUEST TO DISCLOSE GRAND JURY MATERIALS TO GENERAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FRANKFURT AM MAIN
Plaintiff:
USA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
