Cases 81 - 90 of 88,860
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Waterfield Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant:
Waterfield Technologies, Inc., Klaus Hillmann, Frank Bryant and others
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepherd v. Philpot et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Lydia Shepherd
Defendant:
Tabitha Philpot and Sabrina Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHSPSC ACO Holdings, LLC v. Imperium Health Management, LLC
as 3:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
CHSPSC ACO Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Imperium Health Management, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC v. Greenberg et al
as 3:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC
Defendant:
Daniel S. Greenberg, Carla D. Gifford, The Estate of Marian Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Real Property
Helton v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Ricky M. Helton
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Vickie Wright
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Bart Tyner, Mark Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Letsinger v. Northeast Correctional et al
as 3:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Glen C. Letsinger
Defendant:
Northeast Correctional, Lois M. DeBerry and Nashville General Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
