Cases 31 - 40 of 88,860
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartol
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Qin v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dujie Qin
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Deel v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Rachel Deel
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ardd v. Harrison
as 2:2024cv02324
Petitioner:
Nickey Ardd
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Singleton v. Nashville Police Dept. et al
as 2:2024cv02332
Plaintiff:
Timothy Singleton
Defendant:
Nashville Police Dept., City of Nashville, Tennessee State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker-Whitlow v. Meharry Medical College
as 3:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Chantel Baker-Whitlow
Defendant:
Meharry Medical College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mansfield v. Andry et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Albert Mansfield
Defendant:
Nikulin Andry, VTS Transportation, Inc. and Anatoliy Vasilyevich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Kirk et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Cory J. Davis
Defendant:
Alan S. Kirk, Ashley Scott, Kari Sams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
