Cases 1 - 10 of 130
James Walker v. K. Allsup, et al
as 23-1398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
K. ALLSUP, V. WOOD, ROBIN ROWALD and others
James Walker v. K. Allsup, et al
as 23-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES E. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
K. ALLSUP, V. WOOD, ROBIN ROWALD and others
Frederick Walker v. Randall Hepp
as 22-2990
Petitioner / Appellant:
FREDERICK E. WALKER
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDALL HEPP
Matthew Sanchez, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-3383
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SANCHEZ, DOUGLAS E. WALKER, JONAS DELAGRANGE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR., WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States and others
Paul Walker v. USA
as 16-3319
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL E. WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hubert Walker v. Trailer Transit, Inc.
as 15-1482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HUBERT E. WALKER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TRAILER TRANSIT, INC.
James Munson v. Donald Hulick, et al
as 14-3431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MUNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD A. HULICK, Warden, DONALD GAETZ, Warden/Administrative Officer, Menard Correctional Center, ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Larry Hayes v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY C. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SHERRY HILE, DONALD A. HULICK, Warden and others
Titus Linton v. Michael Randle, et al
as 14-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS V. LINTON, also known as TUTANKHAMEEN AL-JIHAD AL-SHAYKH AL-JABAL IBN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDLE, EDDIE JONES, Warden, GUY PIERCE and others
Craig Childress v. Roger Walker, Jr., et al
as 14-1204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG A. CHILDRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., Director of Illinois Department of Corrections, JOHN EVANS, Warden, ROBERT HILLIARD, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
