Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Hall v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2020cv05627
Respondent:
Dee Dee Brookhart and Deanna Brookhart
Petitioner:
Rapheal Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Varnauskas v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2020cv02446
Respondent:
I.D.O.C., Dee Dee Brookhart and State of Illinois
Petitioner:
Steven J. Varnauskas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sypolt et al v. The Illinois Gaming Board et al
as 1:2019cv05991
Defendant:
Mark Ostrowski, Anthony Garcia, Thomas Hobgood and others
Plaintiff:
Trudy's Cafe, LLC, Kevin Sypolt and Phase IV-D, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabb v. Brookhart
as 1:2019cv05906
Respondent:
Kwame Raoul, Dee, Dee Brookhart and Dr. Deanna Brookhart
Petitioner:
Tyrone Gabb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haney et al v. Winnebago County Board et al
as 3:2019cv50191
Plaintiff:
Frank Giammarese, Jackie Thompson, Ed Geeser and others
Defendant:
Dorothy Redd, Joe Hoffman, County of Winnebago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dee v. Heisner
as 1:2019cv04249
Petitioner:
Henry Dee
Respondent:
R.A. Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fowler v. Brookhart et al
as 1:2019cv01498
Respondent:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Petitioner:
Peter Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robbins v. Illinois State Troopers et al
as 1:2018cv04536
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Piotr Dudek, Illinois Trooper #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dee Robbins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trias Holding AG v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv03522
Plaintiff:
Trias Holding AG
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", zhang xiao bo, Vernon Kearns and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Asani v. Dee et al
as 1:2018cv00331
Plaintiff:
Ashim Asani
Defendant:
Officer Dee , Officer Hartley and Village of Carpentersville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
