Cases 21 - 30 of 69
McNeal et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Shan Collins, C.O. Reed, Sgt. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Miller, Terrell Amerson, Paul Donley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohn v. U S Marshals
as 3:2021cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Bohn
Defendant:
U S Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. County of St Clair et al
as 3:2021cv00074
Defendant:
Shan Collins, Richard Watson, Mike Simms and others
Plaintiff:
Steven R Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohn v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Petitioner:
Jonathan W. Bohn and Wade Bohn
Respondent:
FBOP and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 3:2020cv01336
Defendant:
Lori Krull, C/O Geisen, Jarrod Peters and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Davis v. Glen Carbon, Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv01310
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Police Department Glen Carbon, Illinois, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fly v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2020cv00902
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Joint Prisoner Transport Systems, U.S. Public Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Toni Fly, Tony Fly, Toniya Fly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harvey, Jr. v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2020cv00384
Defendant:
Shelia Lewis, Lt. DeWeese, Michael Remmers and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant Harvey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hackney v. US Marshals Service et al
as 3:2020cv00015
Defendant:
C/O Middendorf, Jarod Peters, US Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Q. Hackney, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Marshall County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2019cv01372
Defendant:
Marshall County Sheriffs Dept., Wayne Strawn and Dr. Hatton
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
