Cases 31 - 40 of 209
Phillips - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Coldren
as 1:2022cv00135
Defendant:
John Coldren and John Coldren Lawler
Plaintiff:
James Lee Phillips and James L Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Singh v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillip Singh and Michael P Singh
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, John T Boyd, Al Ott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoder v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Phillip Yoder
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Seely v. Seely et al
as 1:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
John Seely
Defendant:
James Seely, Phillip Houk, Gregory Pachmayr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Wabash City of et al
as 3:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Byron L. Johnson
Defendant:
Wabash City of, Drew Bender and Corey Phillipe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Wabash City of et al
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Byron L. Johnson
Defendant:
CITY OF WABASH, INDIANA, Drew Bender, Corey Phillipe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00970
Plaintiff:
David Phillips and Deborah Phillips
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00342
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lopez v. Jail Staff et al
as 3:2021cv00822
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lopez, Jr
Defendant:
Jail Staff and Tammy Cambell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finnegan v. Foerg et al
as 3:2021cv00783
Defendant:
Jeffery K Richwine, Dale J Starkes, Phillip Foerg and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Grant Finnegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
