Cases 31 - 40 of 89
GARRETT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04703
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACKSON-WATSON et al v. GARRETT
as 2:2019cv00465
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA A. JACKSON-WATSON, FRANCIS E. WATSON, Z. E. W. and others
Defendant:
TERRY GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GARRETT v. MEIJER STORES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2019cv03198
Plaintiff:
CONNIE GARRETT
Defendant:
MEIJER STORES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GARRETT et al v. AQUATIC RENOVATION SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2019cv01509
Defendant:
AQUATIC RENOVATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MAXEY and ANTWANN GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
GARRETT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01463
Plaintiff:
SAM GARRETT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
GARRETT v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02927
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GARRETT
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
