Cases 31 - 40 of 836
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Defendant:
MOUSER, ARAMARK, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Defendant:
FLOWER'S DORM REP, JOHN DOE'S, DYLAN J. CABANAW and others
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAMER v. QUAKENBUSH
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CRAMER
Defendant:
DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RICE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, K. DANIELS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HERNANDEZ v. ANONYMOUS HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jose Hernandez
Defendant:
Anonymous Health of Indiana, LLC, Jane Doe, R.N., John Doe, M.D. and others
SMITH v. ALABI et al
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
CADEN LEE SMITH
Defendant:
G. ALABI and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
KEITH ALLEN BALL
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC, BARBARA RIGGS and JANE OR JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERBERT v. SKINNER et al
as 1:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Chance Herbert
Defendant:
TONY SKINNER, OFFICER FOX, OFFICER KIRBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
