Cases 31 - 40 of 105
MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE et al v. BEUTLER, INC.
as 1:2019cv03364
Defendant:
BEUTLER, INC. D/B/A GEORGE J. SHAW CONSTRUCTION CO. and BEUTLER, INC.
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHAW v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv03089
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A SHAW and ROBERT A. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. STEVENS
as 1:2019cv02179
Defendant:
DAVIS, STEVEN REYNOLDS, MELANIE BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN L. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. NEAL
as 1:2019cv01887
Respondent:
RON NEAL
Petitioner:
TROY R. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DICKERSON v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv01533
Defendant:
A. SHAW, M. FRANKLIN, M. PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOTKINS v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
SHAW, DAVIS, SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ARTHUR BOTKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. BELL
as 2:2019cv00072
Petitioner:
PIERRE LAMAR SHAW
Respondent:
J.R. BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DYE v. MARSHAL OF THE BROOKLYN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv02802
Plaintiff:
TERRY R DYE and TERRY R. DYE
Defendant:
BRADLEY K SHAW, INDIANA STATE POLICE, MIKE TUMMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MANLEY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv02254
Defendant:
KRUL, A. PETTY, J. DENNEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. MANLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv02046
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH NEUBERT, JASMINE FREEMAN, KIZZY STARNES and others
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER ESSURE INC., BAYER S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
