Cases 61 - 70 of 217
THOMAS v. BABCZAK et al
as 1:2020cv00598
Defendant:
BRIAN M. BABCZAK, JOSH CAREY and HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
REGGIE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSTON v. QUAKENBUSH et al
as 1:2020cv00422
Defendant:
UNDERWOOD, HAINES, QUAKENBUSH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYE et al v. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Plaintiff:
SARAH DYE, DOUGLAS MACKEY and SCHOONER CREEK FARM
Defendant:
JOHN HAMILTON, CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA, MARCIA VELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALE v. HAMILTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., D/B/A CORIZON, LLC, MATTHEW LAWSON, EL HADJI NDLAYE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. BALE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TYLER A. BALE, DECEASED and JAMES D. BALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERZ v. HAMILTON
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
CHARLENE PFENNINGER, DENNIS SASSO, SANDY SASSO and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
HERZ v. CONGREGATION BETH-EL ZEDECK et al
as 1:2019cv04810
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, ETZ CHAIM SEPHARDIC CONGREGATION, JUDGE MARC ROTHENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MAYS v. HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2019cv04503
Plaintiff:
STEVEN E. MAYS
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMILTON v. CLEAN SWEEP PLUS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00529
Defendant:
CLEAN SWEEP PLUS, INC., CARMEN RAMSEY and T. SCOTT RAMSEY
Plaintiff:
CIARA HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAMILTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04426
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
