Cases 1 - 10 of 24
GOODWIN v. GRAY et al
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
DAVID GOODWIN
Defendant:
TONY GRAY and CLARA DEBOSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.T. v. ROSE et al
as 3:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
NICOLE GOODWIN and D.T.
Defendant:
P.O. MICHAEL ROSE, DETECTIVE P.A. ZIMMER and CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GOODWIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02964
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
CHIQUITA GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GREEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2019cv00481
Plaintiff:
JAMIE R. GREEN
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, MANNLY, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODWIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02775
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
PENNEY GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GOODWIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv02412
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
317) 237-1000 (fax:
John T. Schlafer, John T. Schlafer and John T. Schlafer
Plaintiff:
TINA GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOODWIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01221
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
HODRUS GOODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02889
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
