Cases 1 - 10 of 105
PRATHER v. HASSLER et al
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
REGINALD PRATHER
Defendant:
NATHAN HASSLER, JOHN MONTGOMERY, PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
CATHY L. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HARRIS et al v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
JAMES STEVENS, INDIANA PAROLE DIST. NO 7, CWM SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MONTGOMERY v. KING et al
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
KENDALL MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
LYNETTE KING, V. OSBURN, HEFLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MONTGOMERY v. IDOC et al
as 2:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
COREY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
IDOC and RDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
JOSHAWA SCOTT COLLINS
Defendant:
PHELAN MONTGOMERY, ANN SMITH MISCHLER and CLARK COTTOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. RAWLE et al
as 1:2022cv01620
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BOWMAN
Defendant:
MARY RAWLE, THE CENTER FOR GESTALT DEVELOPMENT, INC., JOHN J. POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
