Cases 61 - 70 of 101,958
TAYLOR v. PLATT et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BRETT TAYLOR
Defendant:
DAVID PLATT, OJO, EMMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swartz v. Owens et al
as 1:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Henry Swartz
Defendant:
Russell Owens, Kelly Nelson, Daniel Rainy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlick v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Cobretti Matlick
Defendant:
William Zimmerman, . Stinder and . Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2024cv02140
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
. Gonzalez, Kim .., Jody Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Danner et al
as 2:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ramos
Defendant:
Kim Danner, Ellen Hayes and Becky Shirley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Crown and Common Bar and Grill et al
as 2:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Shaun Alexander
Defendant:
Crown and Common Bar and Grill and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega v. Cushing et al
as 2:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vega
Defendant:
Capt Daniel Cushing, Capt Michael Cole, Lt Anthony Matushak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50233
Petitioner:
Julian Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Coleman v. John Doe's 1-11 et al
as 3:2024cv50232
Plaintiff:
Sally Coleman
Defendant:
John Doe's 1-11, Jennifer Rold and Courtney Fectz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04994
Plaintiff:
Semaj Ratliff, Larrion Brown, Rynalder Williams and others
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
