Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Hendry et al v. Lake County, Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Craig Hendry and Tyler Pierce
Defendant:
Lake County, Indiana, Lake County Sheriff Oscar Martinez, Joseph Kraus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stahmann v. Pierce
as 2:2023cv01685
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Barbara Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borsuk, Jill v. Pierce, Khloe et al
as 3:2023cv00794
Plaintiff:
Jill L. Borsuk
Defendant:
Khloe Pierce, Amy Heimann, Sauk County Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stahmann v. Menzel et al
as 2:2023cv01192
Plaintiff:
Rhoda Stahmann
Defendant:
Kristin Menzel, Barbra Pierce, Michael Fink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAMMON vs CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv01413
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GAMMON
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and KENNETH PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Zantac Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Pierce
Defendant:
Zantac Corporation, Family Dollar, Sanofi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Angela Pierce v. Calumet County, Wisconsin, et al
as 23-1280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA PIERCE
Defendant / Appellee:
CALUMET COUNTY, WISCONSIN, BRETT J. BOWE, JULIE HOERNING and others
Chicago Title Land Trust, Trust No. 127632, et al v. Joel Chupack, et al
as 22-3265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHICAGO TITLE LAND TRUST, TRUST NO. 127632, ROBERT ANTHONY BRYANT, RIDGELAND CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CODILIS & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and others
Kimbrell v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jody D Kimbrell and Jody Kimbrell
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, NA, Brian T Moyniham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
