Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Leed et al v. Pitney et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Cody Leed, Kimberlie Mollette and Aiden Manges
Defendant:
Matthew Pitney, Matthew Hassell, Marshall County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dix v. Edelman Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06561
Defendant:
Theresa Miller, Edelman Financial Services, LLC, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohammed v. The State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv50133
Defendant:
Andrea Szczepanski, Paul Leong, Saima Azfar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grubbs v. McFarland et al
as 1:2020cv01075
Plaintiff:
Matthew Grubbs
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe 2, Amy L McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMONS v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL et al
as 1:2019cv04668
Defendant:
JANE DOE #2, JANE DOE #1 and INDIANA UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CLEMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. County of Racine et al
as 2:2018cv01020
Defendant:
Christopher Schmaling, John Doe #1, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi A Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weis v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
Haley N Weis
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe #1 et al v Murphy et al
as 2:2016cv02393
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 , Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
David Murphy, Robert Windmiller, George McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szeklinski v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue et al
as 2:2016cv01451
Plaintiff:
Douglas Szeklinski
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Richard Chandler, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Alexander et al
as 1:2016cv05155
Plaintiff:
Krystal Ellis
Defendant:
Dana Alexander, Barbara West, Robert Klich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
