Cases 131 - 140 of 26,574
Amaya v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv03828
Petitioner:
Daniel Amaya
Respondent:
Chance Jones, Latoya Hughes and Kwame Raoulm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLemore v. Downey
as 2:2024cv02105
Petitioner:
Kwatez Shadee McLemore
Respondent:
Michael Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hineman v. Gierach
as 2:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Hineman and Jeffrey L Hineman
Respondent:
Michael Gireach and Warden Michael Gierach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Hawk v. Indiana Attorney General
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner:
Scotty Lee Van Hawk and Scotty Van Hawk
Respondent:
Indiana Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElrath v. Ball
as 2:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Donald Lee McElrath
Respondent:
Denita R Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEACHER v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
ROBERT PEACHER
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent:
DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03795
Petitioner:
Lawrence Whitfield
Respondent:
Tom Dart and Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyce v. DeHaan
as 2:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Ladarius Boyce
Respondent:
Suzanne DeHaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
