Cases 21 - 30 of 215
Murphy v. Joiner et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Katina L Joiner, Michelle Howell, . Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
MURPHY EDWARDS
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS, DENNIS REAGAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Tec et al
as 1:2022cv04098
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy and Andreya Montrise
Defendant:
Andraya Tec, Bolin and Knudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Wilks et al
as 1:2022cv03673
Plaintiff:
Joseph Murphy
Defendant:
Justin Wilks, Lt. Nolan and Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Murphy et al
as 1:2022cv03570
Plaintiff:
Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
Steven T Murphy, Quentin Tanner, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farage v. Murphy et al
as 2:2022cv00681
Plaintiff:
Kyle Farage
Defendant:
Dr Murphy, D Proehl, Julie Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Director of B.O.P. et al
as 1:2022cv02459
Plaintiff:
Darius J. Murphy
Defendant:
Director of B.O.P., Warden of Metropolition Correctional Center, Lt. Joy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson, Floyd Parker, Jermaine Murphy and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Daniel Monti, A Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Murphy v. Jorden Sparling, et al
as 22-1281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN MURPHY
Defendant / Appellee:
JORDEN SPARLING, JOSHUA A. SCHOENBECK, TERRENCE T. JACKSON and others
ELLIS v. DAVIS CARPER et al
as 1:2021cv02750
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA DAVIS CARPER, JODIE MURPHY, BRITTNEY GROVES-MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
