Cases 21 - 30 of 1,730
Jeffrey Akard v. Mark Sevier, et al
as 24-1971
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY AKARD
Defendant:
MARK R. SEVIER, Warden, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Benedict v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50214
Plaintiff:
William Byron Benedict
Defendant:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jamaine Brown
Defendant:
Lt Fisher, Captain Remarkiwitcz, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv50200
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Defendant:
Leavenworh Penitentiary, Warden D. Hudson, McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Kimberly et al
as 3:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Warden Kimberly, Christel Crow, Placement Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Mack v. Kurt Osmundson, et al
as 24-1556
Plaintiff:
HENRY L. MACK
Defendant:
KURT OSMUNDSON, CHERRYL HINTHORNE, Warden, AMALIA MANNING and others
White v. Warden, USP Thomson et al
as 3:2024cv50188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth White
Defendant:
Warden, USP Thomson and R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Turley v. Justin Hammers, et al
as 24-1889
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. TURLEY
Defendant:
JUSTIN HAMMERS, CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden, MARK WILLIAMS and others
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
DAMON JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
