Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Schwartz
as 3:2021cv50466
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinkney v. Officer et al
as 1:2020cv00829
Defendant:
Cook County Government, Tom Dart and Transportation Officer
Plaintiff:
James Edward Pinkney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant, James v. Twing, Jeff et al
as 3:2019cv00632
Defendant:
Madison Police Department, Milwaukee House of Corrections, Jeff Twing and others
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOUBEAUX v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2019cv00205
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD GOUBEAUX, JR.
Defendant:
ERIC FERGUSON, ANDERBERG, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heard v. Wexford Health Services et al
as 1:2016cv02176
Plaintiff:
James Edward Heard
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Saleh Obaisi, Louis Shicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Schneider et al
as 1:2014cv00727
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
Jesse Schneider , Brian Greff, Lt Sabish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Meli et al
as 1:2014cv00702
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
Tony Meli , Mr Wood, Mr Sabish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PENICK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al
as 2:2012cv00341
Defendant:
JULIE ANN BEIGHLEY, H. LAPPIN, H. M. MARBERRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD PENICK
Name Unknow:
PRISON CONTRACT OPTOMETRIST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Bratlien et al
as 1:2012cv03739
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
Supt. Bratlien, Lt. Johnson, Sgt. Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinson v. Ghosh et al
as 1:2011cv04669
Plaintiff:
Bob Brinson
Defendant:
Parthasarathi Ghosh, Liping Zhang, Lt. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
