Cases 11 - 20 of 101
Moorish Science Temple of America v. Gist et al
as 1:2022cv01466
Plaintiff:
Moorish Science Temple of America
Defendant:
Gist, Lacey, Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bobby Curry v Pedro Guzman, et al
as 1:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Bobby Curry
Defendant:
Pedro Guzman, Emmet J. Welch, HA Mohammad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NATHAN HASSLER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY LORENZO CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIE v. EVANSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2021cv00021
Defendant:
HENSLEY, BUELTEL, NICK SAMMET and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY L. CURRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. BARBER et al
as 1:2021cv00191
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALLEN
Defendant:
VIRGINIA CAUDILL, NATHAN PARTON, JOHN JAY BOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2020cv03110
Defendant:
K. CUTCLIFF, PHIL BOWERS, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CURRY et al
as 1:2020cv03089
Plaintiff:
JUAN CHARLES LEVON SCOTT, KENNETH SCOTT, KENNETH LAMAR SCOTT, JR. and others
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, CURRY, MICHAEL STUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
