Cases 21 - 30 of 275
MACLIN et al v. RILEY et al
as 1:2023cv01776
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MACLIN and VICKIE DRIVER
Defendant:
LUCAS RILEY, ALEXANDER GREGORY, CARL CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
ALEXANDER v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2023cv01498
Plaintiff:
DARION JOSEPH ALEXANDER
Defendant:
TODD EDWARD ROKITA and JACOB HOWERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bates et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv05531
Plaintiff:
Sky Bates and Tutankhamen Lee
Defendant:
City of Chicago, T.J. Alexander and C.E. Alequin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2023cv05311
Plaintiff:
Catherine Brown
Defendant:
Daniel Gutierrez, Alexander Giglio, Marcus Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Milbeck, Ryan-William v. George, Allison et al
as 3:2023cv00525
Plaintiff:
Ryan-William Milbeck
Defendant:
Deputy Allison George, Sergeant Alexander Sanchez, Margaret M. Drees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harry Barnett v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2509
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY BARNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, ALEXANDER KULISEK and ANITA ALVAREZ
Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
as 23-2080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Holloway v. South Bend City of et al
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Courtney Holloway
Defendant:
City of South Bend, Officer Alexander Williams, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
