Cases 21 - 30 of 79
Dix v. Edelman Financial Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06561
Defendant:
Theresa Miller, Edelman Financial Services, LLC, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Dix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mohammed v. The State of Illinois et al
as 3:2020cv50133
Defendant:
Andrea Szczepanski, Paul Leong, Saima Azfar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Mohammed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04830
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
CLEMONS v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL et al
as 1:2019cv04668
Defendant:
JANE DOE #2, JANE DOE #1 and INDIANA UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CLEMONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Awanata v. Hertz Global Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv07888
Defendant:
Hertz Global Holdings Inc., John and Jane Does 1-999, Hertz Rental Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Oya Awanata
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2018cv50235
Defendant:
John Pixler, Sue Keiser, Jane Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Sharrie F. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. County of Racine et al
as 2:2018cv01020
Defendant:
Christopher Schmaling, John Doe #1, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi A Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chicagoans et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2018cv04242
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Eddie Johnson , Michael Tomaso and others
Plaintiff:
Chicagoans For An End To The Gang Database , Black Youth Project 100 Chicago , Blocks Together and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
