Cases 31 - 40 of 358
Kovacic et al v. Oconto County Sheriff Todd Skarban et al
as 1:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kovacic and Tammy Kovacic
Defendant:
Oconto County Sheriff Todd Skarban, Mary Ruechel, Dave Rosenfeldt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Frano et al
as 1:2023cv02724
Plaintiff:
Allen Robinson
Defendant:
Wayne Frano, Vincent Celio, Carl Brasic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robinson et al v Knutson
as 2:2023cv00517
Plaintiff:
Lamar Robinson and Martell Rogers
Defendant:
Grace E Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jaworski, et al. v. Trianafillo, et al.
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
David Jaworski, Sarah Kroth, Maggie Robinson and others
Defendant:
#264 James Trianafillo, #19637 Luis Laurenzana, #13262 David Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stovall v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EL v. MARION SUPERIOR COURT 10 et al
as 1:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
CHEYOU EL
Defendant:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT 10, REGINA TIDWELL, MARIA MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
