Cases 31 - 40 of 98
Gupta v. Kraus et al
as 1:2019cv06651
Defendant:
John Doe (1), Anaisa Alice Claudio, Jason Mitchem and others
Plaintiff:
Ashish Gupta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WANG et al v. CITY OF FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv04042
Defendant:
SETH JOHNSON, DAVID BOHMEIER, JOHN DOE 7 and others
Plaintiff:
CHUEN HUA WANG, GUARDIAN CHUEN HUA WANG and TIAN HUEI WANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2019cv05196
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, John Doe 2, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Plaintiff:
Precious Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOSTETLER et al v. DOE 1 et al
as 1:2018cv03995
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MILLER, GEORGE BISHOP, VANCE BRIGGS and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. County of Racine et al
as 2:2018cv01020
Defendant:
Christopher Schmaling, John Doe #1, Nurse Jane Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Heidi A Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weis v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
Haley N Weis
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reginald Tolbert, Jr. v. John Doe 1, et al
as 18-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD L. TOLBERT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, Officer 1, JOHN DOE 2, Officer 2 and JOHN DOE 3, Officer 3
Smith v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2018cv00143
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Edward A Flynn, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reginald Tolbert, Jr. v. John Doe 1, et al
as 17-3499
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD L. TOLBERT, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, Officer 1, JOHN DOE 2, Officer 2 and JOHN DOE 3, Officer 3
LEVY v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv03090
Defendant:
JOHN DOE (1), JOHN DOE (2), T. SCOTT HUNT and others
Plaintiff:
GAI LEVY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
