Cases 41 - 50 of 363
Evans v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05980
Plaintiff:
Dionte Evans
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former Police Sgt. Ronald Watts, Former Police Sgt. Alvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Evans v. Anthrax et al
as 2:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Jovon Evans
Defendant:
Anthrax and Wisconsin Department of Health Services Division of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04337
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jackson
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Patrick Boyle, Jennifer Burmistrz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Internal Revenue Service
as 2:2022cv00927
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Jovon Evans
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sandifer v. Stahl et al
as 2:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Evan Sandifer
Defendant:
Detective James Stahl, Detective Michael Hinch and Lieutenant Michael Hamady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DOYLE v. SCHERSCHEL
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE
Defendant:
JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEELY v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
CINDY K. NEELY
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, EVAN MATHEIS and KLINTON STREETER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
