Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Roland v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11398
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Roland
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Jane Hyslop, Carol Sieliga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. May et al
as 4:2016cv04254
Plaintiff:
Delrico J Nelson
Defendant:
Lindsey May, J. Rhodes, S. Butterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUICK et al v. CITY OF BEECH GROVE
as 1:2016cv01709
Defendant:
CITY OF BEECH GROVE
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MAYS-MILLER and KYMBERLY QUICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steffes et al v. Teague et al
as 2:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Michael A Steffes and Mary May Morririos
Defendant:
Courtney Teague and Diane Larson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Jet Center, Inc. v. AFCO AvPORTS Management, LLC, et al
as 16-1233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY JET CENTER, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
AFCO AVPORTS MANAGEMENT, LLC, GARY/CHICAGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY, STEPHEN MAYS and others
Ollison v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Eric Ollison
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Marcus Hardy, Arthur Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary Jet Center Inc v. AFCO AvPORTS Management LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00368
Plaintiff:
Gary Jet Center Inc
Defendant:
AFCO AvPORTS Management LLC , Gary/Chicago International Airport Authority , Stephen Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
May, Samuel v. Blaser, Dennis et al
as 3:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Samuel May
Defendant:
Dennis Blaser, Theresa Wetzsteon, Penny Kaplanek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
