Cases 41 - 50 of 2,337
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 1 U.S.C. § 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buck Sr. v. City of Hammond School Board
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Buck Sr.
Defendant:
City of Hammond School Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaPlante v. City of Muskego et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
John R LaPlante
Defendant:
City of Muskego, Samuel Weinkauf, Shawn Diedrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gassman v. Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Debra Gassman
Defendant:
Cook County, Sharone R. Mitchell, Jr., solely in his Official Capacity as the Public Defender of Cook County and Sharone R Mitchell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TAYLOR et al v. SHIVELY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW TAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE C. SHIVELY, ROBERT PIGMAN, MARY MARGARET LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Mark Petersen v. Stefanie Pedersen
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
MARK R. PETERSEN
Defendant:
STEFANIE PEDERSEN
Alexander Fels v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER A. FELS
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President of the United States, HAKEEM JEFFRIES, Minority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives and JANET YELLEN, United States Secretary of the Treasury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
