Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Singh v. Gegare et al
as 2:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
Aman Singh
Defendant:
Adam Gegare, Lt Gloudamanz, Lisa Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
KONCHINSKY v. DIAZ et al
as 1:2014cv01078
Defendant:
RANDY DIAZ, IMPD OFFICER JOHN DOE, I, IMPD OFFICER JOHN DOE, II and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA KONCHINSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weber v. Houde et al
as 1:2014cv04127
Plaintiff:
Christian Weber
Defendant:
John Houde and Villige of Glencoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Saunders-El v. Eric Rohde, et al
as 14-1570
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMAR SAUNDERS-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC ROHDE, Officer, NICHOLAS WEBER, Officer, JAMES BOWMAN, Detective and others
Martinez v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martinez
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Jeffrey Weber, Allyson Bogdalek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liera-Chavez et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv09032
Plaintiff:
Carmen Liera-Chavez , Hamill Liera , Jesus Rodriguez-Ramirez and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago, J. Pulia (Star #6311), William Orsa (Star #17885) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novak et al v. Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv08861
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Novak, Christina Bugelas Novak and T.N.
Defendant:
Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC, Lieberman Management Services, Inc., Donna Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Harrington v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv08277
Plaintiff:
Marcus Harrington
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Derek Duszak and Jaime Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv09487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
