Cases 81 - 90 of 4,804
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
LaPlante v. City of Muskego et al
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
John R LaPlante
Defendant:
City of Muskego, Samuel Weinkauf, Shawn Diedrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcus Shoenthal v. City of Seymour, et al
as 24-1208
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SHOENTHAL
Defendant:
CITY OF SEYMOUR, BRYANT LUCAS, Chief in his individual and official capacity, GREG O'BRIEN, Assistant Chief in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nuttall v. Michigan City City of et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tracey Nuttall and Tracey Nuttall personal representative
Defendant:
City of Michigan City, Michigan City Police Officer Matthew Babcock, Michigan City Police Officer Rene Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
