Cases 1 - 10 of 1,575
Flinn et al v. City of Evanston
as 1:2024cv04269
Plaintiff:
Margot Flinn, Carol Johnson, Stasys Neimanas and others
Defendant:
City of Evanston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MPC et al v. Racine County et al
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
MPC and CMC
Defendant:
Racine County, Jalee Banach, Hope Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Neal Johnson v. Ryan Edwards, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
O'NEAL JOHNSON
Defendant:
RYAN EDWARDS, DENNIS HECKER, JR., TIMOTHY BALASZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATHIS v. JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2024cv00720
Plaintiff:
DAVID MATHIS, JR.
Defendant:
JOHNSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as MILLERS MERRY MANOR and MILLERS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
