Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Evans v. Shiver et al
as 3:2023cv50164
Defendant:
Jane McFee, Donald Shiver, Carpenter's Place and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
CARPENTER v. TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA
as 4:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
GARY CARPENTER
Defendant:
TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
J.L.R. et al v. Elkhart County et al
as 3:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lee Reschly, Alisia Kay Hails, J.L.R. and others
Defendant:
Elkhart County and Peter D Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Teddy Driver v. Ty Solomon, et al
as 22-2151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEDDY H. DRIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
TY SOLOMON, Kokomo Police Officer #372, TRAVIS WILLIAMS, Kokomo Police Officer #387, CODY RAYLS, Kokomo Police Officer, a.k.a. OFFICER CODY RAYLES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
