Cases 1 - 8 of 8
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOMER ET AL V. NOEL ET AL
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Coomer, tarin Cox, Lindsey Culver and others
Defendant:
Jamie Noel, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, David J Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCOTT v. CURRY et al
as 1:2020cv03089
Plaintiff:
JUAN CHARLES LEVON SCOTT, KENNETH SCOTT, KENNETH LAMAR SCOTT, JR. and others
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, CURRY, MICHAEL STUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTRIDGE v. CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIANA STATE POLICE POST 45, MATHEW ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DARREN EASTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COTTRELL v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Defendant:
MIKE HAMMOND, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRAD JONES and others
Plaintiff:
GREG COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. CARLSON et al
as 4:2011cv00042
Defendant:
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTER OF CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CURTIS M. CARLSON, DALE CARLSON and others
Plaintiff:
REVEREND LISA MARIA MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01318
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PATTERSON and R. P.
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SCOTT COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEWART v. MUNICIPALITY OF CLARKSVILLE et al
as 4:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
RODNEY STEWART
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF CLARKSVILLE, CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPT., EIGHT UNKNOWN CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPT. OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
