Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Andy Williams, Jr. v. City of Aurora, Illinois, et al
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF AURORA, ILLINOIS, MAYOR RICHARD IRVIN AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF AURORA, KRISTEN ZIMAN and others
Andy Williams, Jr. v. Heartland Realty Investors, Inc., et al
as 24-1491
Plaintiff:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
HEARTLAND REALTY INVESTORS, INC. and HEARTLAND WILLOWBROOK LLC, doing business as WILLOWBROOK APARTMENT HOMES
MIDDLETON v. PYATTE et al
as 1:2023cv00729
Petitioner:
ROBERT R. MIDDLETON
Respondent:
PAULA K. PYATTE, REBECCA M. EIMERMAN, BRIAN H. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Andy Williams, Jr. v. USA
as 22-3121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDY H. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. Pritzker et al
as 2:2020cv02050
Defendant:
Aquelle M Stone, JB Pritzker, Laura McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Louis H Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv07116
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
CLAUZELL WILLIAMS and Clauzell H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mihai v. Williams et al
as 1:2014cv08645
Plaintiff:
Mircea Mihai
Defendant:
John H Williams, Jr., Felicia G Armstead, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv06726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv04938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
