Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Helene Miller v. DVA, et al
as 23-2589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and MILITARY ENTRANCE PROCESS SERVICES
Laurent Miller v. U.S. Department Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2023cv03248
Plaintiff:
Admiral Ms. Helene Tonique Laurent Miller
Defendant:
U.S. Department Veteran Affairs, U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs and Military Entrance Process Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Bowers v. Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs et al
as 2:2021cv00749
Defendant:
Tony Evers, Paul E Knapp and Wisconsin Department of Military Affairs
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
MILLER v. MILITARY
as 1:2019cv03595
Defendant:
MILITARY
Plaintiff:
CHARISSE ILENE MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johns, Jason v. Leonard, Jack et al
as 3:2018cv00599
Defendant:
Jack Leonard and Military Order of the Purple Heart of the U.S.A., Inc. ("MOPH")
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
