Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Roach, Jr. v. Winnebago County Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv50014
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Roach, Jr.
Defendant:
Winnebago County Police Department, Alison Meason, Alex Ronning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Acevedo et al v. Mattioli et al
as 2:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jose Acevedo and Estate of Joel Acevedo
Defendant:
Michael A Mattioli, Robert Roach and Alfonso Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HANKINS et al v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
REBECCA JANE HANKINS and DAVID JAMES ROACH
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, SHERRI BENTLY, TROY TARPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
BIBBS v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00939
Defendant:
JOHN ARVIN, MARK YLER, BRYAN ROACH and others
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM D. BIBBS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORSEY v. FRANKLIN COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 3:2020cv00076
Defendant:
DOE, ROACH, FRANKLIN COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MITCHUM v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2019cv02277
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT (IMPD), ALFRED ROBINSON, BRYAN ROACH and others
Plaintiff:
GORDON MITCHUM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knuth v. Roach et al
as 2:2019cv02027
Defendant:
Vermilion County, Patrick Hartshorn, Vermilion County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Knuth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
