Cases 11 - 20 of 88
HUSPON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv02018
Plaintiff:
TERRY HUSPON
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, BRUCE LEMMON, RICHARD BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Purcell et al
as 2:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Benson
Defendant:
MD K Purcell, Wellpath Healthcare Staff, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
JARMAH HILL
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB, BEN LALOUX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISON v. W.V.C.F. et al
as 2:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
DAVID ISON
Defendant:
W.V.C.F., I.D.O.C., PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEALS v. PURCELL et al
as 2:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
WARREN ALEXANDER BEALS
Defendant:
RANDALL PURCELL, ABIGAIL COOPER, SCOTT FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Jenkins v. Richard Brown, et al
as 23-1540
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CECIL JENKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD BROWN, JERRY SNYDER, CHARLES DUGAN and others
GREENLEE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY GREENLEE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILLMORE, DICK BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L. RICE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JOHN POWERS, RANDALL PURCELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STERLING et al v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
DEVON STERLING
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, ROBERT E. CARTER, CHRISTINA REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
