Cases 11 - 20 of 731
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1428
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
Ryan D Blackwell
Respondent:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson, Atlas v. Doe 1 thru 12, John et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Atlas Watson
Defendant:
Staff John Doe 1 thru 12, Staff Jane Doe 1 thru 12, Dr. Ledesma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen Lush v. Lorie Burns, et al
as 24-1194
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN LUSH
Defendant:
LORIE BURNS, MIDDLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, STEVEN WATSON and others
Blackwell v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
Ryan Demond Blackwell and Goo Zuhayr El
Defendant:
Richard Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovejoy v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03017
Plaintiff:
Laurence Lovejoy
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, Tara Goins, Shana Clarkson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. SNYDER et al
as 1:2023cv02320
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
JERRY SNYDER, B. LALOUX, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
