Cases 191 - 200 of 101,300
Jeffery, Glen v. Schlachter, Austin et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Glen R. Jeffery, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Austin R. Schlachter, Brooke M. Steingraeber, Drays S. Matthews and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Andrade et al
as 2:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Jose D Reyes
Defendant:
CO Andrade, CO Eiche and Lt Stanik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElrath v. Ball
as 2:2024cv00572
Petitioner:
Donald Lee McElrath
Respondent:
Denita R Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robertson v. Laster et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jermel Robertson
Defendant:
Earlean Laster and Robert E Webb, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrion Brown v. City of Urbana, Illinois, et al
as 24-1809
Plaintiff:
DARRION BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS, RICHARD SURLES, MICHAEL CERVANTES and others
Young v. Bowden et al
as 1:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Young
Defendant:
T Bowden, . Clauss, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nefer Neb v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv03787
Plaintiff:
Ken Nefer Neb and Darrell McKee
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John or Jane Doe, Iris Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02216
Plaintiff:
Shunte Lamont Mayfield
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
