Cases 21 - 30 of 201
Floyd v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv06506
Petitioner:
Robert Floyd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams, Devonte v. Waldera, Zachary et al
as 3:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
DEVONTE M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Gary Boughton, Stacey Hoem, Todd Bresee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIDWELL v. C/O LOCK et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
SHAWN M. KIDWELL
Defendant:
C/O LOCK, C/O LOVANS, ZELIFITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Bradley, Sr. v. Rob Van Norman, et al
as 22-2545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON D. BRADLEY, SR., also known as BRITTNEY HARDAWAY BRADLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB VAN NORMAN, NICK SKREPENSKI and DEPUTY FLOYD
JOHNSON v. MITCHELL
as 3:2022cv00103
Petitioner:
FLOYD WAYNE JOHNSON
Respondent:
DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Semons v. Taulbut et al
as 2:2022cv00594
Plaintiff:
Floyd L Semons
Defendant:
J Taulbut, R Frye and Kayla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Squires et al
as 1:2022cv01761
Plaintiff:
Darion Floyd
Defendant:
M. Squires, T. Rusher, Miguel Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Bradley v. Robert Van Norman, et al
as 22-1398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON D. BRADLEY, SR., also known as BRITTNEY HARDAWAY BRADLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB VAN NORMAN, NICK SKREPENSKI and DEPUTY FLOYD
Thompson et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00438
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson, Floyd Parker, Jermaine Murphy and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Daniel Monti, A Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Floyd v. Squires et al
as 1:2021cv06204
Plaintiff:
Darion Floyd
Defendant:
M. Squires, T Rusher, Miguel Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
