Cases 21 - 30 of 365
Lowman et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Lowman, Christopher T. Farr, Monte J Conrad, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Tammy Grime, St. Clair County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Farris v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Allen M. Farris
Defendant:
Aaron M. Hopkins, Franklin County Jail, Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEE BRYANT
Defendant:
ANDREA FRANKLIN, CONSTANCE SCHMITT, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. USA
as 1:2022cv02254
Petitioner:
JAMES FRANKLIN TAYLOR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00517
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Crane v. Franklin
as 1:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Travis Crane
Defendant:
Jeffrey Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FENNELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00401
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN V. FENNELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
VIGO COUNTY SCHOOL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Wakefield v. Franklin County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2022cv01766
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff Dept., David Bartoni and Kyle Bacon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wakefield v. Franklin County Courts et al
as 3:2022cv01772
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Defendant:
Franklin County Courts, Kevin Popit and Ed Dorcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wakefield v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv01768
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail, Anthony Scoble, S. Barra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
