Cases 21 - 30 of 260
Henigan v. Lucas et al
as 2:2022cv00964
Plaintiff:
Elijah Terrell Henigan
Defendant:
Earnell R Lucas, Aaron Dobson, CO Pit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00435
Petitioner:
Kenneth J. Lawson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lawson v. Galipeau et al.
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Carey G Lawson and Corey G Lawson
Defendant:
John Galipeau and Robert Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. GALIPEANU et al
as 1:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
CAREY G LAWSON
Defendant:
JOHN GALIPEANU and ROBERT CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burt-Brazziel v. Glaze et al
as 2:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Howard Elwon Burt-Brazziel
Defendant:
Glaze, Simmons, Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. NORTON et al
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
NORTON and LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Lawson et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Darnell Perry
Defendant:
Julie Lawson and Todd Rokita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CABLE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES CABLE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, INDIANA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szpila v. Elliott et al
as 2:2021cv02304
Plaintiff:
Rhyian Szpila
Defendant:
. Elliott, Jim Rowe, Benjamin Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
