Cases 21 - 30 of 1,775
Johnson v. Tims et al
as 2:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Steven Miller Johnson
Defendant:
Shana Tims, Nicole McDade and Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan Dyjak v. Stacey Horstman, et al
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant:
STACEY HORSTMAN, JO-AN LYNN and LANA MILLER
MILLER et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MILLER, LEVI DC GILLIS and JUSTIN MICHAEL BLUEHER
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, FUNKHOUSER and LOHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. USA
as 2:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
KERRI MILLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Henry Mack v. Kurt Osmundson, et al
as 24-1556
Plaintiff:
HENRY L. MACK
Defendant:
KURT OSMUNDSON, CHERRYL HINTHORNE, Warden, AMALIA MANNING and others
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Enochs v. Hain et al
as 1:2024cv02639
Plaintiff:
Damarques Debronte Enochs
Defendant:
Ron Hain, McKanna, Bredlau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Brown
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Shoopman, . Render and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
