Cases 21 - 30 of 232
Smith v. Dix et al
as 3:2022cv50386
Plaintiff:
Deon F. Smith
Defendant:
Dix, Wolf, Unknown Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murithi et al v. Godnez et al
as 1:2022cv06023
Plaintiff:
Mwenda Murithi
Defendant:
Salvador A Godnez, Sherry Benton, Kimberly Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2022cv00930
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kinta Jenkins
Defendant:
Wheeler, Wolf and J Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Wheeler et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Rodney Kinta Jenkins
Defendant:
Wheeler, Wolf and J Wallen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDER v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WILDER
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLC, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv01206
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Wolf
Defendant:
John Doe and State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Peters et al
as 3:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
Antoine D. Meeks
Defendant:
Jarrod Peters, Randolph County Sheriff's Office, Chris Guisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLETON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
SHARNEE APPLETON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, BEDWELL, L. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEMASTERS v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROBERT LEMASTERS
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, BYRD, AULER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Wolf
Defendant:
John Doe, State of Wisconsin and Brown County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
