Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Murphy v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv01105
Defendant:
Colleen, Holt, Lonske and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen A Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv04285
Defendant:
TERRY, ROSHAY, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES INGRAM and CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLEMAN et al v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA, INC., NIKKI TAFOYA, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ZARAGOZA and ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv02346
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, AGNES A. OPOKU, WILLSON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIS INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingram v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Plaintiff:
Charles Willis Ingram
Defendant:
Agnes A Opoku, Willson, Knight and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2019cv01740
Defendant:
NICOLE CURTIS, MCNARY, RIVERS and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY MICHAEL WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2019cv00700
Defendant:
JOHN R. LAYTON, TERESA PIERCE, GACHAW and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANKH-EL v. MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant:
DAVIS, GIBSON, R. ALLEGA and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. GEO GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00016
Defendant:
MELLANDER, DAVIS, CHARLES FAENZA and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Warden
as 3:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
Mr Ronald J Pierce
Respondent:
Warden
Undetermined:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
