Cases 31 - 40 of 1,218
Joe Feazell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1435
Plaintiff:
JOE FEAZELL
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and PAMELA E. HART, Administrator of the Estate of Andrew H. Tilden
Nichols v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00796
Plaintiff:
Demetrius H. Nichols
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Dr. Garcia, K Osmundon and others
Petitioner:
Jeffrey J. Neslund and Michael D. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WINSTON v. TREVASKIS
as 1:2024cv00486
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. WINSTON, II
Defendant:
H. TREVASKIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poon v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00752
Petitioner:
Susan H. Poon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winston v. Trevaskis
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Winston, II
Defendant:
H. Trevaskis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braden v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Defendant:
Curdy, English, Corty and others
Plaintiff:
James M Braden
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilks, Timothy v. Hannula, J. et al
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wilks
Defendant:
Dr. J. Hannula, Dr. R. Maddikunta, RN E. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barry v. English et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Scott Thomas Barry
Defendant:
English, Christina Reagle and Justin H. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Zoerner et al
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
ArQuincy Lee Carr
Defendant:
Sheriff David Zoerner, Lt Kurt McKutis, J Sgt Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
