Cases 31 - 40 of 7,647
Jones v. Warden et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
Katie, Warden, Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
David Michael Jones
Not Yet Classified:
PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Henderson v. Christopher Vertz
as 24-1697
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. HENDERSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VERTZ
Michael Hays v. Marion County Sheriff
as 24-1693
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HAYS
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF
Martin v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
Brittany Valencia Martin
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Jon Loftus, Melinda Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Placencia v. USA
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Michael L Placencia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MILLER et al v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MILLER, LEVI DC GILLIS and JUSTIN MICHAEL BLUEHER
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, FUNKHOUSER and LOHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RINKER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
ADONIS ROBERT RINKER
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL CECIL, BRIDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Johnson v. David Gomez, et al
as 24-1634
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID GOMEZ, Warden of Stateville, WENDY OLSEN, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
