Cases 31 - 40 of 1,284
PRINGLE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis-Rogers v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Akiel Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
John Doe and Jamall Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scoby v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv03824
Plaintiff:
Roger M. Scoby
Defendant:
United States, John B. Hadjioannou and 5 Unknown Named Agents of Federal Task Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rogers v. Illinois Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv03583
Plaintiff:
Udell Rogers
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rogers v. Lowery et al
as 3:2023cv01936
Plaintiff:
Tony Rogers
Defendant:
Renata Lowery and Wexford Health Sources Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01879
Plaintiff:
Robert C Rogers
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Jail, et al
as 23-2054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY JAIL, ELKHART COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, B. ROGERS, Deputy Lieutenant and others
PRINGLE v. INDIANA GOVERNMENT
as 2:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
ROGER PRINGLE
Defendant:
INDIANA GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
REGAN v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
LEROY REGAN
Defendant:
ROGER JONES, U.S.P. TERRE HAUTE F.B.O.P. HEALTH SERVICE DEPT. REAL PARTY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
